if it could all exist at the same time

freedom and liberation does not lead us to a place that is gross and unkempt.

we all learned to clean up after ourselves. we all learned to care for each other and help one up if they fall.

we are all able. we have literally everything that we need.

we have all the supplies, we have all the space we have all that we need right down the street. its all there.

there is no better than, there is just supplies. there is just supplies.

and we MUST understand it is not stab your neighbor it is invite your neighbor into your home and make them tea and ask them if they want to drive to our aldermans house and shoot them in the head.

its a call your landlord and tell them they have enough and no one is paying them.

eviction is null, all art is correct.

nothing is real, and nothing is keeping it all running.

think about the things you do when you do nothing. what if you could do that because you can.

what if there was nothing in the way of that.

what if nothing was actually taken from you, but the pressure of its necessity was lifted.

what lies beyond the systems?

a university in the midwest is the core of the american system. it’s progression is surface level and not much changes. and if someone wanted to show me those changes that happen i would like to see them, like the core ones. like an entire section of cords being ripped out of the wall and replaced, not just one or two. when you understand what learning is you also must understand that learning must evolve. that the ways we teach and the ways we understand must change. that the ways we ask questions and the ways we answer them should switch. to present with the answer is incorrect and to ask the question is only half of the progress.

When asking questions we should weigh the importance of varying differences in questions and how we delegate the ways each kind of question is treated.

• When there is a question of pure curiosity that detracts from the context we have to understand that this question creates a larger circle around the context and then we lose our way and it takes us longer to return back.

• If the question is asked in a way of connecting two or more points or consensuses, we may “answer” the question with a means to delve into that thought. questions are thoughts, they should help us move through a context rather than just help us describe the context.

If we are stuck on the description of the context, then we cannot move through.

How will you connect those points? and build an orbit around the context? focusing on building the orbit, focusing on creating more things that exist outside of the context but are still in relation to it because of its pull, not because of their attachment.

i talked to Sam about making up a new math and this is kind of a more philosophical idea of that conversation we had. does anyone know any key words i could search on google that could get me to someone that’s also thinking about this? thank you

notes : multimodality, context, social and computer networks, and mobility as organizing principles for examining digital media.

boundaries without conversation

hey, i cant right now.

hey i dont think i can add much to this.

hey i think i want to do this myself

hey, i dont need your help right now.

hey thanks for offering but it feels too much for me to hold your generosity

hey, you owe me this.

hey i actually dont have much to give so i would rather you not be generous to me. it makes me feel like i owe you and that makes me uncomfortable.

hey im not really in the mood to take from you right now.

even if it is better inside i always want out